Journal Home
Search for

Volume 145, Issue 1, Pages 27-34 (28 January 2009)


View previous. 8 of 22 View next.

Characterization of upper thoracic spinal neurons responding to esophageal distension in diabetic rats

Chao QinaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Marie L.M. Ghorbanib, Mingyuan Wua, Jay P. Farbera, Jianxing Mac, Robert D. Foremana

Received 19 September 2008; accepted 10 October 2008.

Abstract 

The aim of this study was to examine spinal neuronal processing of innocuous and noxious mechanical inputs from the esophagus in diabetic rats. Streptozotocin (50 mg/kg, ip) was used to induce diabetes in 15 male Sprague–Dawley rats, and vehicle (10 mM citrate buffer) was injected into 15 rats as control. Four to eleven weeks after injections, extracellular potentials of single thoracic (T3) spinal neurons were recorded in pentobarbital anesthetized, paralyzed, and ventilated rats. Esophageal distensions (ED, 0.2, 0.4 ml, 20 s) were produced by water inflation of a latex balloon in the thoracic esophagus. Noxious ED (0.4 ml, 20 s) altered activity of 44% (55/126) and 38% (50/132) of spinal neurons in diabetic and control rats, respectively. The short-lasting excitatory responses to ED were encountered more frequently in diabetic rats (27/42 vs 15/41, P<0.05). Spinal neurons with low threshold for excitatory responses to ED were more frequently encountered in diabetic rats (33/42 vs 23/41, P<0.05). However, mean excitatory responses and duration of responses to noxious ED were significantly reduced for high-threshold neurons in diabetic rats (7.4±1.1 vs 13.9±3.3 imp/s; 19.0±2.3 vs 31.2±5.5 s; P<0.05). In addition, more large size somatic receptive fields were found for spinal neurons with esophageal input in diabetic rats than in control rats (28/42 vs 19/45, P<0.05). These results suggested that diabetes influenced response characteristics of thoracic spinal neurons receiving mechanical esophageal input, which might indicate an altered spinal visceroceptive processing underlying diabetic esophageal neuropathy.

a Department of Physiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73190, USA

b Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, The Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100, Denmark

c Department of Internal Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73190, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Physiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, P.O. Box 26901, Oklahoma City, OK 73190, USA. Tel.: +1 405 271 2226x56272; fax: +1 405 271 3181.

PII: S1566-0702(08)00192-6

doi:10.1016/j.autneu.2008.10.015


View previous. 8 of 22 View next.